• Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Morgantown, WV Personal Injury Lawyers

Hamstead, Williams & Shook

  • About the Firm
  • Attorneys
  • Practice Areas
    • Personal Injury
      • Negligence
      • Toxic Torts
      • Personal Injury Damages
      • Factors Affecting Damages Awards
    • Auto Accidents
      • Accident Law Overview
      • Auto Accident Causes
      • Automobile Damage FAQ
      • Auto Insurance Coverage
      • Auto Accident Injury Data
      • Passenger Injuries
      • Pedestrian Injuries
      • What To Do After An Auto Accident
      • Morgantown Attorney for Seatbelt Issues
      • Auto Accident Fatality Charts
    • Truck Accidents
      • Large Truck Accident Data
    • Brain Injury
      • TBI Data
      • Experts Involved In Treating And Proving TBI
      • Indications of TBI
      • Proving Traumatic Brain Injury
    • Spinal Cord Injury
      • Damages In SCI Cases
      • Effects of Spinal Chord Injury
      • Preventing Spinal Cord Injuries
    • Insurance Bad Faith
      • Bad Faith: Insurance Adjusters
    • Nursing Home Abuse
      • Nursing Home Checklist
      • Government Regulation of Nursing Homes
      • Jury Verdicts / Settlements in Nursing Home Cases Around the Country
    • Dog Bite Injury
      • Dog Bites
      • Dog Bite Injury Data
      • Preventing Dog Bites
    • Drunk Drivers
      • Drunk Driving Data
      • Drunk Driving FAQ
      • Blood Alcohol Levels
    • Bus Accidents
      • School Bus Accidents
      • Bus Accident Charts
    • Slip & Fall
      • Property Owner’s Duty
      • What To Do If You Slip And Fall
    • Wrongful Death
      • Damages For Wrongful Death
      • Defenses In A Wrongful Death Suit
      • Death In The Workplace
    • Medical Malpractice
      • Causation
      • Types of Damages
      • Delayed Cancer Diagnosis
      • Establishing A Duty of Medical Care
      • Hospital Liability
      • Informed Consent
      • Types of Malpractice
      • Surgical Complications Indicating Possible Malpractice
    • Workplace Injuries
      • Deliberate Intention
    • Labor and Employment
    • Defective Products
      • What Is Product Liability?
      • Types of Product Defects
      • Defenses to Products Liability Claims
      • Our Strategy in Product Liability Cases
      • Statute of Limitations for Product Liability
    • Social Security Disability
    • Insurance Claims
    • Litigation
    • Motorcycle and Bicycle Accidents
      • Motorcycle Accidents
      • Motorcycle Accident Charts
      • Tips For Preventing Motorcycle Injuries
  • Cases
    • Personal Injury – Motor Vehicle
    • Personal Injury – MOTORCYCLE
    • Personal Injury – PREMISES LIABILITY
    • Personal Injury – DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS
    • Wrongful Death – MOTOR VEHICLE
    • Wrongful Death – DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS
    • Medical Malpractice
    • Employment Termination
  • Legal FAQ
  • Contact
  • Blog

Defenses In A Wrongful Death Suit

In addition to statute of limitation restrictions, there are defenses that may be used to combat a wrongful death suit. The available defenses are limited to those that could have been made against the decedent had he or she lived and brought his or her own claim for personal injuries. The main defenses are causation, comparative negligence, and imputed comparative negligence. The availability of any of these defenses may bar a plaintiff from recovery or, at the very least, reduce the amount of damages awarded.

Causation

In order to hold a defendant responsible for wrongful death, you must prove that the defendant’s conduct was the cause of the decedent’s death. To satisfy this requirement, you do not have to show that the defendant was the only responsible party. You must only show a connection between the defendant’s conduct and the injury, such that the injury would not have occurred without the defendant’s actions.

Example: If a person was killed on Corporation X’s amusement ride in part due to improper maintenance of a seat belt, but also because another rider pushed the decedent off the seat, Corporation X may still be found liable for damages.

Often, the period when the fault occurred and when death results can take seconds, as in the case of a car accident where a victim dies at the scene, or months, as where a doctor prescribes the wrong medication that over time results in the patient’s death. The period between the fault and the injury, however, is not a controlling factor necessary to show proximate cause. For example, if a decedent died due to injuries he received in an accident three months ago, the negligent wrongdoer is still liable.

The continuous causal connection between the fault and the injury is the important element necessary to prove causation in a wrongful death suit. Think of the concept of continuous causal connection as a line that connects from the fault to the injury. The line represents the sequence of events that occur from the point of fault to the point of injury. In the car accident example mentioned earlier, the defendant’s car crashed into the victim’s car and the victim died. In that instance, there was an obvious connection between the fault (the auto crash) and the injury (death).

If there is no causal connection, the defendant will not be found responsible. If prior to death the decedent did not exercise reasonable care in obtaining treatment for the injury, it might be found that the proximate cause of the decedent’s death was not due to the defendant’s conduct or activity, but rather due to the decedent’s own actions.

Example: A person gets a serious head injury and does not get immediate medical attention. After several days of head pains, the person goes the hospital. While at the hospital, the person dies from his injuries while the hospital was delayed in trying to diagnose his injury. Although, the hospital may have been negligent in its treatment, the proximate cause of death may be found to be the person’s failure to seek medical attention if earlier treatment may have prevented his death.

Comparative Negligence

Comparative negligence is conduct by the decedent that contributed to his or her own death.

Example: A person riding a bicycle at night without brakes or light reflectors who is later struck and killed by a truck may be comparatively negligent.

If a decedent is comparatively negligent, the amount of any damages awarded may be reduced by the percentage of fault assigned to the decedent. The defense of comparative negligence, however, is a fact for the jury to consider and it generally cannot be determined until after a case begins.

Imputed Comparative Negligence

In some instances, one of the beneficiaries may be comparatively negligent or responsible for the decedent’s death. In some states, if one beneficiary is partially or wholly at fault in the decedent’s death, the other beneficiaries cannot sue for wrongful death. In West Virginia, however, a beneficiary who is partially at fault may recover damages. Beneficiaries who are not negligent in the death of the decedent may also still recover damages. W. Va. Code § 55-7-5.

 

Related Content

 

  • Damages for Wrongful Death
  • Defenses in a Wrongful Death Suit

 

  • Death in the Workplace

 

 

In all matters involving personal injury it is essential that measures be taken promptly to preserve evidence, investigate the accident in question, and file a lawsuit prior to the deadline imposed by the Statute of Limitations. If you or a loved one is a victim of personal injuries, call Hamstead, Williams & Shook P.L.L.C. now at 888 – 298 – 2529. The initial consultation is free of charge, and if we agree to accept your case, we will work on a Contingent Fee basis, which means we get paid for our services only if there is a monetary award or recovery of funds. Don’t delay! You may have a valid claim and be entitled to compensation for your injuries, but a lawsuit must be filed before the statute of limitations expires. 

The above is not legal advice. That can only come from a qualified attorney who is familiar with all the facts and circumstances of a particular, specific case and the relevant law. See Terms of Use. 

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Don’t Worry About Your Case Right Now
  • Daylight Savings Time Creates Increased Risk To Drivers
  • Qui Tam Relators and the False Claims Act

Contact Hamstead, Williams & Shook

  • Buckle Your Baby For Life
  • Auto Accident App
  • Video Library
  • Intentional Torts
  • Contingency Fees
  • Terms and Conditions of Use
  • Statute of Limitations
  • State Resources

Copyright © 2021 · Infinity Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in